08/10/2009 : Football League Blog : Unmasking The Real Owners Behind Football Clubs
8 October 2009 : Unmasking The Real Owners Behind Football Clubs
Football League Chairman Lord Mawhinney plans to discuss the regulation of club ownership at a Football League Board meeting today. Although there was talk of the need to address this issue in Mawhinney's speech at the Leaders In Football Conference on Wednesday, the question of how to provide solutions to the problem were not considered in that speech.

Mawhinney has told BBC Five Live though that this will come up today at the league's board meeting today, and although he is careful to stress that the rule will be a generic one not aimed at any particular club, the national media have immediately highlighted cases involving Notts County, Leeds United and Queens Park Rangers. The QPR case is a bit of a red herring and concerns one of their shareholder's suitability to remain in that capacity, which is a little different from the Leeds and Notts County cases.

The league want to "know who the beneficial owners are" of each of their Member Clubs. This is linked in with the existing Fit and Proper Persons Test which carries a set of criteria where individuals are barred from having more than a 30 percent ownership of a Football Club if they have an unspent criminal conviction involving dishonesty, or who have run a football club into administration twice. It is also linked to the overall integrity of the game, where individuals are prevented from having financial interests in more than one football club.

The issue is that many clubs now are not owned directly by individuals. Yeovil Town are no exception to this, with Huish Park Stadium Partnership Ltd holding over 90 percent of the allocated shareholding. A football club's holding company could in turn be also owned by another company, and so on. Whilst searches on directorships and shareholdings for UK registered companies are relatively simple, they become more complex in the case of overseas investment, which is where the likes of Leeds United and Notts County are causing so much interest.

Both clubs, so far, have refused to name who their ultimate beneficial owners are - i.e. the individuals that sit at the top of the tree of companies that have put up the money to buy their football clubs. Notts County are owned by Munto Finance. They in turn are owned by Qadbak Investments who are a Middle-Eastern Consortium. The question of exactly who owns Qadbak is a little more vague, with certain people having been named, and then others subsequently issuing denials that they are any part of this consortium.

Leeds United are owned by the Forward Sports Fund, which is registered in the Cayman Islands. Leeds Chairman Ken Bates had initially said that he and his financial advisor Patrick Murrin co-owned the only shares in Forward but has since admitted that this was "an error on my part" and that in fact he doesn't have any shares in Forward.

Exactly how a businessman can make such an "error" isn't clear - this isn't a case of someone thinking that they'd bought a pint of milk from the supermarket and then getting home and then realising they hadn't. This is a case of someone thinking they owned a company which owns a whole Football Club and then realising "oops, actually I don't own Leeds United after all". Obviously, an easy mistake to make. The ownership of the Forward Sports Fund is therefore now entirely unknown, and therefore the registration of the club's owners with the Football League was presumably submitted with incorrect information.

Why does this matter? Firstly, the integrity of the game has to be upheld. If it turned out - for example - that the owners of the Forward Sports Fund were also the owners of Yeovil Town, where would that leave us if Leeds came to Huish Park desperately needing three points for promotion, whilst the Glovers sat in mid-table safety? Meanwhile on the following week, Yeovil face Charlton Athletic, and Leeds loan out Jermaine Beckford to the Glovers.

Secondly, the Football League (and in turn the Football Association) have a duty to act as the regulators and guardians of the game and thus to protect supporters from having their clubs run by unsuitable individuals. For every club that falls into administration, or one that is found to be run by crooks or charlatans, the reputation of the game suffers. And the supporters of that club suffer. Whilst Football Clubs have to be allowed to operate without too much regulation, the league do have a moral duty to ensure that the chances of a convicted fraudster getting hold of a football club are minimised.

If the Football League don't know who the ultimate owners of a Football Club are, then it stands to reason that they also are unable to apply their Fit and Proper Person Test. They are also unable to hold any proof of ownership or investigate any potential for a conflict of interests.

Mawhinney has told the BBC that he has no problem with overseas investment as such, but believes that such investors should be reminded that the Football League is a Private Members Club with its own constitution and rules:

"The law of the land complicates issues because people are allowed to put their money offshore and in many places that accords them anonymity that makes scrutiny very difficult. You don't defy the law of the land - if people want to do that, they can do it but If you want to place your money offshore and you want to have the anonymity then don't come and ask if you can play in my league because I think all of our clubs should know basically the structure of the clubs they are playing against."

The purpose of today's Football League Board Meeting will be to determine just how far the Board are entitled to go in their pursuit of getting club owners to reveal themselves. The Premier League insist that any person holding more than 10 percent in their clubs must publically reveal their identity - something that may prove interesting if Leeds harbour ambitions to re-enter the top flight. Mawhinney currently is willing to accept that such information is kept confidential between the holding company and the League, but insists that the issue of ownership must be put on the table now:

"It's our Football League and, if we decide we want to know certain information before we allow people play in our league, I think we are probably entitled to do that but I have been taking some serious legal advice on this subject. I am confident I can make a case to my colleagues, then it is up to them. I have been extremely careful in my remarks not to speak about specific clubs. I'm talking about a policy decision, a general principle. Having given this a lot of thought in recent weeks, I am comfortable in my position on this matter."

Exactly why a club's owners feel the need for secrecy over their identity or their motives is not altogether clear. Whilst not every club owner wants to be cast into the limelight, holding a scarf aloft in press photos, or butting in on proceedings down on the training ground, it is healthy for their identity and their motives to be out in the open. When you create a culture of secrecy, or hide behind your true identity, it creates mistrust and sends out the hounds chasing a scent, trying to find the mystery that lurks within. It fuels the rumourmill and it creates misinformation. Hence it's difficult to understand how it can be good for business, for supporter-club relationships and for that club's general standing in the game. There is a little bit of Yeovil Town in the above in recent years, although thankfully nothing on the scale of Leeds or County.

You only have to look at the way the national press are hounding Notts County, and the general cynicism over Ken Bates' role at Leeds United to see the effect that it has upon those clubs. If County had revealed their investors on Day One, then the media circus would have long since left town, but because it creates intrigue and because it creates headlines it stays with them. Notts County's Chief Executive Peter Trembling has complained this week that the "unprecedented backlash they've had from certain sections of the media has been quite scandalous". But haven't they brought that backlash upon themselves?


Back to Top of Page

Comments On This Article
There are no comments on this article yet. However, you are welcome to submit your own using the form below.
Submit Your Own Comments

Name :


E-Mail :


Notify Me When Comments Are Added To This Article?




NOTE: Your name will appear against your comment, but your email address will not be displayed. It is only required in case we need to contact you. It will not be distributed to anyone outside Ciderspace.

Enter Comments/Opinions On This Article:



Back to Top of Page

Other Entries In The Football League Blog Section.
Date Title Author Link
02/03/2013 Membership Of The Football League Ciderspace Link
02/03/2013 William McGregor And The Early Days Ciderspace Link
02/03/2013 The Dawn Of The Football League Ciderspace Link
26/01/2013 The League One Promotion Race Henry Hudson Link
20/01/2013 Does The Administration Rule Need Revisiting? Badger Link
09/07/2010 Football League Survey 2010 Detailed Results Badger Link
25/06/2010 Pressure Grows For League Sporting Sanctions To Be Increased Badger Link
18/06/2010 Making A Perfect Pitch Badger Link
06/06/2010 On The Agenda At The Football League AGM Badger Link
14/05/2010 Hearn Calls For Double Relegation For 'Cheating' Clubs Badger Link
13/05/2010 Football's Silly Season Badger Link
10/05/2010 Tears, Tantrums And Two-Bob Clubs Badger Link
04/05/2010 Levelling The Playing Field For Next Season Badger Link
30/04/2010 Fancy An Extra £217,000 Per Season? No Thanks! Badger Link
28/04/2010 Full Transparency For Football League Club Ownership? Badger Link
19/11/2009 Tis The Season To Post Losses Badger Link
08/10/2009 Unmasking The Real Owners Behind Football Clubs Badger Link
06/10/2009 What A Difference A Gate Makes Badger Link
06/07/2009 The Worries Of Becoming A Small Club Badger Link
20/05/2009 The North-South Divide Badger Link
25/01/2008 Football League Review : January 25th 2008 Josh Rogers Link
18/01/2008 Football League Review : January 18th 2008 Josh Rogers Link
08/01/2008 Football League Review : January 8th 2008 Josh Rogers Link
21/12/2007 Football League Review : December 21st 2007 Josh Rogers Link
14/12/2007 Football League Review : December 14th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
07/12/2007 Football League Review : December 7th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
04/12/2007 Football League Review : December 4th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
23/11/2007 Football League Review : November 18th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
09/11/2007 Football League Review : November 9th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
06/11/2007 Football League Review : November 6th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
27/10/2007 Football League Review : October 27th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
20/10/2007 Football League Review : October 20th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
16/10/2007 Football League Review : October 16th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
07/10/2007 Football League Review : October 7th 2007 Josh Rogers Link
31/07/2006 But Not At Huish Park..........? Ciderspace Link
31/07/2006 'Real Football Roar' Award Ciderspace Link
25/07/2006 Mandatory Two Year Bans Introduced Ciderspace Link
13/07/2006 Agent Fees Fall For Glovers And League Ciderspace Link
01/02/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.10 Badger Link
30/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.9 Badger Link
27/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.8 Badger Link
26/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.7 Badger Link
25/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.6 Badger Link
16/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.5 Badger Link
12/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.4 Badger Link
11/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.3 Badger Link
09/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.2 Badger Link
04/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.1 Badger Link
Other Entries By Badger.
DateTitleAuthorLink
04/06/2013Three Are FreeBadgerLink
01/06/2013Grounds For ImprovementBadgerLink
29/05/2013The Size Of The Championship TaskBadgerLink
05/05/2013Next Goal Wins?BadgerLink
03/05/2013What Are Our Chances In This Season's Play-Offs?BadgerLink
08/04/2013Target SixBadgerLink
05/03/2013Planning For The Future Part OneBadgerLink
20/01/2013Does The Administration Rule Need Revisiting?BadgerLink
11/01/2013From Bramall Lane To Bramall LaneBadgerLink
09/01/2013Wembley Goes West In East LondonBadgerLink
31/12/2012Waiting In The Arrivals LoungeBadgerLink
25/12/2012Halfway HouseBadgerLink
01/10/2012Preston 3 Yeovil 2 : Deepdale Defeat DissectedBadgerLink
19/09/2012Orient 4 Yeovil 1 : No Case For The DefenceBadgerLink
03/09/2012Attending To AttendancesBadgerLink
22/08/2012Brentford 1 Yeovil 3 : Full Stech SavesBadgerLink
14/08/2012Starting The Season RightBadgerLink
01/07/2012And So It Begins Again ...BadgerLink
26/06/2012The Calm Before The Storm?BadgerLink
06/06/2012Out With The Old And In With The NewBadgerLink
20/05/2012What Price A Striker?BadgerLink
13/05/2012The End Of Short-Termism?BadgerLink
30/04/2012The Waiting GameBadgerLink
23/04/2012All's Well That Ends WellBadgerLink
18/04/2012Decisions, DecisionsBadgerLink
12/04/2012When More Is LessBadgerLink
10/04/2012Mind The GapBadgerLink
01/02/2012Damp Squib Is No SurpriseBadgerLink
11/01/2012The First (Blades) Cut Is The DeepestBadgerLink
08/01/2012Dignity And Respect Needed For Management ChangeBadgerLink
18/12/2011The Future Of BBC Local RadioBadgerLink
14/12/2011Yeovil 0 Fleetwood 2 : The Morning After The Night BeforeBadgerLink
14/11/2011Hereford 0 Yeovil 3: Banana Skin Avoided But Another AwaitsBadgerLink
07/11/2011Chesterfield 2 Yeovil 2 : As You Were ThenBadgerLink
09/07/2010Football League Survey 2010 Detailed ResultsBadgerLink
25/06/2010Pressure Grows For League Sporting Sanctions To Be IncreasedBadgerLink
18/06/2010Making A Perfect PitchBadgerLink
09/06/2010Larrieu Signs New Deal To Set Up A Decade With PilgrimsBadgerLink
08/06/2010Summer Scrapped For Former Loan StarsBadgerLink
08/06/2010Wazza Speaks About Witheridge AppointmentBadgerLink
07/06/2010Wazza Back In BusinessBadgerLink
07/06/2010Stewart Planning Final Season Of Playing CareerBadgerLink
06/06/2010On The Agenda At The Football League AGMBadgerLink
04/06/2010Warne Extends Stay With MillersBadgerLink
14/05/2010Hearn Calls For Double Relegation For 'Cheating' ClubsBadgerLink
13/05/2010Football's Silly SeasonBadgerLink
10/05/2010Tears, Tantrums And Two-Bob ClubsBadgerLink
04/05/2010Levelling The Playing Field For Next SeasonBadgerLink
30/04/2010Fancy An Extra £217,000 Per Season? No Thanks!BadgerLink
28/04/2010Full Transparency For Football League Club Ownership?BadgerLink
10/01/2010The Big Freezes And How They Affected Yeovil TownBadgerLink
04/01/2010A Window Of Little Opportunity?BadgerLink
06/12/2009The Fastest Glovers In The WestBadgerLink
27/11/2009Chipping Away At Yeovil's Travel ProblemsBadgerLink
19/11/2009Tis The Season To Post LossesBadgerLink
08/10/2009Unmasking The Real Owners Behind Football ClubsBadgerLink
06/10/2009What A Difference A Gate MakesBadgerLink
06/07/2009The Worries Of Becoming A Small ClubBadgerLink
03/07/2009The Other Guy - Terry Skiverton In 1999BadgerLink
20/05/2009The North-South DivideBadgerLink
15/10/2007Premium Pricing Attendance Analysis : October 2007BadgerLink
13/03/2007The Effect Of Friday Night Football Upon AttendancesBadgerLink
01/02/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.10BadgerLink
30/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.9BadgerLink
27/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.8BadgerLink
26/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.7BadgerLink
25/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.6BadgerLink
16/01/2006 January Transfer Window Round-Up No.5BadgerLink
12/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.4BadgerLink
11/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.3BadgerLink
09/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.2BadgerLink
04/01/2006January Transfer Window Round-Up No.1BadgerLink
contact ciderspace:ytfcciderspace@yahoo.com
© Ciderspace 2006-2010
Last Updated : 3rd June 2012
design by siteshape
Top